<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Philosophy on nobe4</title><link>https://nobe4.fr/tags/philosophy/</link><description>Recent content in Philosophy on nobe4</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>&lt;a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"&gt;CC BY-SA&lt;/a&gt;</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 12:13:35 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://nobe4.fr/tags/philosophy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Stars</title><link>https://nobe4.fr/posts/stars/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://nobe4.fr/posts/stars/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Being idealistic is hard for me to brush off. I overly enjoy perfection and the
feeling of having created something &lt;em&gt;just right&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Having guidelines, or rules matters only if consistently applied. Code fits
greatly to this via linter, type checkers, formatters, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For other things, I find it useful to have guiding principles, less as strong
rules and more as &lt;em&gt;unreachable states&lt;/em&gt;. Aiming, if never reaching, for something
&lt;strong&gt;perfectly great&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A*ism</title><link>https://nobe4.fr/posts/aism/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://nobe4.fr/posts/aism/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Agnosticism and Atheism are often used interchangeably.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However they mean different things, and ought to be used precisely.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Atheism: absence of belief&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Implicit Atheism absence of belief without conscious rejection&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Explicit Atheism: absence of belief with conscious rejection&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Negative Atheism: absence of belief without assertion of absence&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Positive Atheism: absence of belief with possibility of absence&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Explicit Positive Atheism: absence of belief with assertion of absence&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Agnosticism: absence of knowledge&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Determinism</title><link>https://nobe4.fr/posts/determinism/</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://nobe4.fr/posts/determinism/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="if-causality-has-gaps"&gt;If causality has gaps&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It means that some effects are not the products of what came before. They
emerged outside of the physical laws, in a non-physical space.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gaps are not &lt;em&gt;unexplainability&lt;/em&gt;: electricity was not explained a thousand year
ago. Moreover, future research could explain phenomena we don&amp;rsquo;t yet
understand.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gaps are not &lt;em&gt;unpredictability&lt;/em&gt;: the weather is unpredictable because of its
complexness, yet it respects known laws of atmospheric dynamics and physics.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>